Article Contribution from RA
The following writer has requested for the permission to post his article as the RA notice board has not been RE-INSTALLED.
PERSATUAN PENGHUNI-PENGHUNI PANGSAPURI DESA PERMAI INDAH.
RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
Dated : 24th Sept. 2008.
Dear RA Members,
Re: ADUAN-ADUAN “MAKAN RASUAH & OFFENDING NOTICES” ON RA
I refer to Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhuhan Pulau Pinang (ROS) letter ref no: PPP/PPG 115/97 (30) which is attached herewith for your reference. The below report is an update.
On the 2nd Sept, I was summoned to the ROS office with regard to a request for “PEMERIKSAAN”. (the secretary and treasurer couldn’t make it on that day ) I was shocked when was told that the purpose of the visit was to interview the Chairman with regards to “banyak aduan-aduan telah diterima oleh ROS bahawa RA makan rasuah dan notis notis “offending” dipamerkan di papan kenyataan PDPI. The interview also looked into the record and financial status of the RA.
Apparently we have loser/losers among the residents who resorted to make these aduan-aduan to the ROS with the aim of closing down (tutup kedai) the RA!
These aduan-adaun were clarified and concluded with the officer as follow:
1. I told the officer these accusations are baseless as the RA is just a “HAPPY CLUB” organising social activities for the residents to get along well and living in harmony. As required by law, the RA account is in order and has been audited and submitted to the ROS. The RA does not involve itself in managing and overlook all expenses with regard to the daily and monthly running of this property. The RA is not involved in creating projects and awarding of contracts. That responsibility lies with the MC that manages the fund Rm600,000.00+. However, if there is any basis for makan rasuah, the complainant should lodge a police report as the ROS has no jurisdiction on this matter.
2. The issue of posting notices (on the 4 projects proposed by the MC) on the RA’s notice board was very much clarified via our posted letter dated 12th July 2008. The RA was merely helping the residents in putting up their notices in the RA’s notice board instead of gluing them on the lift wall and glass panel. The RA is helping to keep the place clean. I believe most civil minded residents did observe such instruction. The view expressed was solely of the resident NOT the RA. Again if the complainant felt the notice is offensive, he should lodge a police report as the ROS has no jurisdiction on this matter.
3. We also agreed that the RA is opened to ALL RESIDENTS that reside at Pangsapuri Desa Permai Indah. Membership is only for Malaysian above 18. The MC is a body for registered owner with Strata Title. These are 2 different entity.
The RA would like to thank the ROS’s officer for his advice on running a proper association based on our stipulated rules and regulation. The RA would also like to thank the officer for his understanding on our struggle in running the RA, which is operated voluntary by concerned residents.
The RA’s message to loser/losers making these aduan-aduan (for reason best known to you), YOU HAVE FAILED TO CLOSE DOWN THE RA!
On the 2nd Sept, I was summoned to the ROS office with regard to a request for “PEMERIKSAAN”. (the secretary and treasurer couldn’t make it on that day ) I was shocked when was told that the purpose of the visit was to interview the Chairman with regards to “banyak aduan-aduan telah diterima oleh ROS bahawa RA makan rasuah dan notis notis “offending” dipamerkan di papan kenyataan PDPI. The interview also looked into the record and financial status of the RA.
Apparently we have loser/losers among the residents who resorted to make these aduan-aduan to the ROS with the aim of closing down (tutup kedai) the RA!
These aduan-adaun were clarified and concluded with the officer as follow:
1. I told the officer these accusations are baseless as the RA is just a “HAPPY CLUB” organising social activities for the residents to get along well and living in harmony. As required by law, the RA account is in order and has been audited and submitted to the ROS. The RA does not involve itself in managing and overlook all expenses with regard to the daily and monthly running of this property. The RA is not involved in creating projects and awarding of contracts. That responsibility lies with the MC that manages the fund Rm600,000.00+. However, if there is any basis for makan rasuah, the complainant should lodge a police report as the ROS has no jurisdiction on this matter.
2. The issue of posting notices (on the 4 projects proposed by the MC) on the RA’s notice board was very much clarified via our posted letter dated 12th July 2008. The RA was merely helping the residents in putting up their notices in the RA’s notice board instead of gluing them on the lift wall and glass panel. The RA is helping to keep the place clean. I believe most civil minded residents did observe such instruction. The view expressed was solely of the resident NOT the RA. Again if the complainant felt the notice is offensive, he should lodge a police report as the ROS has no jurisdiction on this matter.
3. We also agreed that the RA is opened to ALL RESIDENTS that reside at Pangsapuri Desa Permai Indah. Membership is only for Malaysian above 18. The MC is a body for registered owner with Strata Title. These are 2 different entity.
The RA would like to thank the ROS’s officer for his advice on running a proper association based on our stipulated rules and regulation. The RA would also like to thank the officer for his understanding on our struggle in running the RA, which is operated voluntary by concerned residents.
The RA’s message to loser/losers making these aduan-aduan (for reason best known to you), YOU HAVE FAILED TO CLOSE DOWN THE RA!
Members, would you like me to reveal the name of the complainants to the ROS?
Yours sincerely,
Kim Wong. (R.A Chairman)
Kim Wong. (R.A Chairman)
1 Comments:
Who else, except those little Napoleans and the old wizard of Oz
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home